Five Years after 9/11, Leftists STILL Suck!
As leftists gleefully celebrate the five-year anniversary of 9/11, and the rest of us reflect on the events of that day with anger and/or sorrow, I feel it is only right that I compile a list of the Top 5 retarded leftist/Islamist arguments about why it happened. As we've learned over the past 5 years, the leftists are solidly behind the Islamists. In fact, after what I have seen and heard from leftists, I am more willing to give so-called "moderate" Muslims the benefit of the doubt than I am to so-called "patriotic" liberals. There is so much that ties these strange bedfellows together. And even though it is the LIBERALS and their policies, tolerance, and degenerate lifestyles that are a major reason why the Islamists hate the West, they will still do all they can to run interference and make excuses for the terrorists, because they have a common enemy for the moment (America and George Bush).
Below are the Top 5 leftist/Islamist arguments for why 9/11 happened. Since both groups make the same arguments, it is hardly worth mentioning who said what (but I'll do so when it's relevant).
5) "It was an inside job." - This was something that Islamists (probably encouraged by CAIR, since they said essentially the same thing) said immediately after 9/11. It was almost as if they were INSTRUCTED (which I'm sure they were) to phone radio talk shows en masse and deny that it was Muslims who did this (until bin Laden actually came out and SAID he was behind it). Today, leftist professors and other tinfoil hat dickheads claim that it was the CIA, the Pentagon, "The Jews" or Dick Cheney who did this. It's incredible to me that Dick Cheney wasn't able to cover up the accidental shooting of his friend during a hunting trip, and yet he has left no fingerprints on what would be the largest conspiracy in the history of the universe.
And doesn't it seem odd that the Muslims deny on one hand that they are even INVOLVED in terrorism, yet in the next breath (like during the Mohammed cartoon riots) they will hold up signs that say "Behead those who insult Islam" and "Allah will give you another 9/11?" Are those people CIA operatives as well? If so, where does the government advertise for these acting jobs? Does the CIA go to community theatres, post the jobs on Craigslist, or just go down to the mosques in those parts of the world and post a Help Wanted sign on the bulletin board for jobs that would pay Muslims to act in a way which would portray their peaceful religion in a negative light? And are the daily attacks in Thailand and India by the religion of peace also a CIA plot? Riddle me this, Batman....
4) "It's our foreign policy" or "We're creating more radical Islamists by our actions." - As I have mentioned repeatedly, leftists and logic are like oil and water (or in their case, oil and VINEGAR, since they're such douches). And whenever a leftist makes an "argument" the most important thing to remember is that it is either complete bullshit (with inaccurate "facts"), it's self-contradictory, it's irrelevant to the story (no cause-and-effect), or it's simply agitprop designed to get you to lose your cool and then they can say something really intelligent like "Oh this is fun. I can imagine your face getting all red with anger" (because leftists are homos who beat their baloney when they can get someone angry by calling our military "Nazis." And when I say "beat their baloney," I am of course referring to leftist women, because the men don't have any).
With the "We're radicalizing Muslims" comment, leftists are once again contradicting themselves. Many of the same people who claim there is no threat from Islamists (you know, the ones who say 9/11 was an inside job) will slip up and actually admit that there IS a threat from radical Islam when they blame our foreign policy for the radicalization of Mooselims. I guess that's a step in the right direction, but the notion that we're creating Islamists is patently absurd.
Think about this: A "moderate" Muslim man (or woman) is walking down the street, just minding his or her own business. All of a sudden, they see a newspaper with a headline about Saddam Hussein being captured, Abu Ghraib, or some other alleged "atrocity" committed by the evil Americans. All of a sudden, the peace-loving member of the religion of peace loses all control of his or her actions, and turns into the Incredible Fucking Hulk (or werewolf). The point is, we're supposed to believe that someone who isn't already radicalized can be converted at the drop of a hat into a throat-cutting jihadist. Hmmmmm. I don't recall Christians ever doing this. If the actions of one group can turn an allegedly peaceful other group into terrorists, then it would certainly work the other way around, would it not? Then why aren't Christians blowing up Mosques, decapitating people, or strapping bombs onto their children? After all, I have seen the handiwork of the Islamists (bombings, beheadings, "honor killings," etc.). I've been infuriated by the actions and foreign policy of Muslim and Eurotrash countries for years. Why then haven't I become a terrorist? Do I now have Carte Blanche to go cut someone's throat? According to liberals and Islamists, the answer is "yes." (Actually it's "no" because leftists and Islamists are working together to try to pull the wool over everyone's eyes about their terrorist agenda. And the "radical" Muslims are ALREADY Islamicized).
3) "We support dictators around the world." - This is another case of leftists contradicting themselves (and being wrong at every turn). What about the Shah of Iran? What about Saddam Hussein? It's leftists who are supporting brutal regimes (N. Korea, Cuba, and the "Freedom Fighters" in Iraq). Nothing represents leftist double-speak better than this "argument." To liberals, if we overthrow a dictator, we're being "Imperialistic." However, when we don't do so, we're "Turning a blind eye" or "Supporting dictators." Leftists CLAIM they want to end poverty and improve human rights around the world. However, there are simply some areas of the world that will never improve unless you change their leadership or "culture." If you really want to make the world a better place, do what Ann Coulter suggested and force them to give up their dictatorships and convert to Christianity. There cannot be changes in many of these places without the use of force. So what should we do? I say unless it affects us directly, we should turn a blind eye. If there's anything we've learned from the Iraq war, it's that all humans are NOT equal. Some cultures are simply inferior. Leftists love to point out that Iraqis hate us and that they're killing each other. But what is there to be happy about? This has only proven that some people don't DESERVE freedom or human rights. They had freedom handed to them on a silver platter (paid for by the blood of Americans) and they spit in our faces. You can take an ape out of the zoo, put him in a suit, and perhaps even strategically shave him. But that doesn’t mean you can then take him to tea with the Queen of England or Princess Masako of Japan and he will behave any differently than he did in the zoo. In fact, he will probably end up flinging his own shit at everybody, just like the ungrateful Islamists are doing to us.
As far as the Shah of Iran goes, it was our LACK of support (thanks to Jimmy Carter) which allowed his demise and the resulting rise of radical Islam in Iran. Yes, he was a dictator, but he wasn't a war-mongering one who threatens another holocaust. And what would liberals have if their pals (which they call "freedom fighters") in Iraq actually WON? What would an Islamic Shiite state look like there? Well, it would look like Iran. 'Nuff said.
2) "We're losing the support of the world." - I've said it before and I'll say it again. We never had the support of the world. As we've known all along, from Bangladesh, to the Palestinian territories, to certain parts of Canada, people around the world hate our guts because of their own inadequacies. Get used to it. They were happy on 9/11, and they're happy with every death in Iraq. At this point, I'm actually looking forward to the next terrorist attack in Europe (or hopefully Canada). These people have shot their mouths off for far too long and I'm personally sick of them taking pleasure in our suffering. I can't WAIT for it to happen to them. Do you think I'll be compassionate about it? Yeah, right....
And the number one argument made by leftists is:
1) "The attacks were the result of a twisted religion that wants to kill or convert the entire free world, especially women, homosexuals, and all non-believers." - Psych! This one is actually TRUE, so it follows that a leftist would NEVER say this. This was a joke to see if you were still paying attention. Ha ha...
The best way to remember September 11 is to kill a leftist, since without their sucking up to muslim fuckheads, we would be free to do what is necessary to ensure there are no living terrorists in our society
© by Michael Cooper 2006