|

In
our Person of the Year article, the Cooper for President team put
a torch to the "Straw Man Argument." This type of argument
(usually made by liberals) involves completely misrepresenting your
opponent's position in order to easily knock it down. Some quick
examples are "Bush said Iraq was an imminent threat," or "Bush said
Iraq had nuclear weapons." In both cases, Bush said no such thing.
However, by employing the straw man argument, one can feel "victorious"
(and that's what's important, is it not? Helping out your little "self
esteem?").
Let's take an expanded look at other types of arguments:
|
Type
|
Logo
|
Description
|
|
|
|
Nobody
embodies the ad hominem (personal) attack like Don Rickles. He was a
very funny insult comic (with an emphasis on funny). Nowadays, it's
just a cheap way of getting out of an argument you know you're going to
lose.
Examples: "Bushie," "Chimpy," "Junior," and "Shrub."
|
|
|
|
Different from the Red Herring, a non-sequitor is a factoid (correct or incorrect) which has nothing to do with the topic
at hand. The non-sequitor is used to muck up the works.
Examples: "3 million jobs lost since 2001," or anything ending with the treatment of Native
Americans.
|
|
|
|
I
could just have easily used General Wesley Clark's mug here, but the
Gollum is much more rational. Needless to say, flip-flopping is
expressing an opinion in stark contrast to a previous (recent)
statement (such as Gen. Clark praising Bush and his cabinet in 2002,
and having such distain for him now). A variant of the flip-flop is
"Playing Both Sides of the Fence" (also known as "Damned if You Do,
Damned if You Don't"). Here's a common example: If Bush ratchets up
Homeland Security, he's being "racist," or "taking away civil
liberties." However, if he doesn't
do this, he's "doing nothing to make us safer." It's a transparent
(albeit annoying as hell) technique used by most Democrats.
|
|
|

|
More
often than not, a red herring is complete bullshit, and it's used to
steer the argument into a ditch. The worst examples are
the so-called "questions" asked by liberals after 9/11 as to why
we were attacked. The premise (that we should find out what it is
we did to upset the Islamists, then stop doing it so they'll just leave
us alone) was (and is) retarded. By the way, they attacked us because
we're not Islamist. End of story. Here are some other examples.
|
|
Innuendo
|

|
Best
personified by everyone's favorite busybody, Gladys Kravitz,
innuendo is a not-so-subtle way of implying that somebody is
guilty of something. True, in the Bewitched television series, Ms.
Kravitz really DID see all sorts of things happening in the house next
door, but she has now come to symbolize the typical snoop (who
annoys the hell out of everyone with her insinuations). The best (and
most recent) example of innuendo in the media involves Halliburton
(pardon me, that's "Dick Cheney's former company,
Halliburton"). It is now required by law that all "journalists"
mention Halliburton at least a dozen times each newscast (and that
Cheney's name proceeds it). Nevermind the fact that Cheney has
no ties to the company anymore (and doesn't own any
stock).
|
|
The Label
|

|
Perhaps
the most important skill of any journalist (print or television) is the
ability to label people with whom they disagree. This will put a
negative taste in the reader's (or viewer's) mouth. Be sure to only
label people you dislike. And all Bush policies MUST have
"controversial" put in front of them (don't put any
negative labels before Michael Moore's name, he's just "Academy
Award winner Michael Moore"). Here are some examples:
Good: "Conservative talk show host Sean Hannity...."
Better: "Controversial arch-conservative talk show host
Sean Hannity....."
Best: "Controversial arch-conservative white male talk
show host Sean Hannity...."
|
|
|
|
Not
much explanation needed here. This is when somebody states something
they KNOW to be untrue (or omits something that IS true).
Therefore, when the "mainstream" media reports that A.N.S.W.E.R.
is a "peace group" (rather than a Trojan Horse neo-commie Maoist
organization), they are LYING.
|
|
|
|
Both
sides use this one. This is essentially dangling something pretty in
front of you in order to make you forget something else (what are you
thinking of right now, by the way?). A great example is the WMD issue.
When we didn't find them in Iraq, many talk show hosts switched
their focus to the liberation of Iraq. A noble cause indeed,
but in the end the listener has forgotten about the original
premise.
|
|
The Spin
|

|
Spinning
is nothing new in journalism. When it was clear that President
Bush's tax cuts fueled the incredible economic growth in the 3rd
quarter of 2003, the press went into overdrive. Instead of simply
reporting economic growth (or quoting economists), they said " Bush takes credit for economic upturn," and " Bush claims
his tax cuts have worked." Notice the spin? Look at the logo to the
left. Now go buy something from the 'tard store.....
|
|
|
|
We've
all heard excuses (as evidenced by the "dog ate my homework" graphic).
In recent months there has been a surge in excuses made by left-wing
assholes regarding the behavior of those around the world who would
kill ALL of us. Leftist dirtbag "celebrities," have shifted gears from
protecting people on death row, and are now busy churning out
hackneyed excuses for Palestinian suicide bombers ("splodeydopes").
|
|
Jumping to Conclusions
|
|
If you're pro gay marriage, the assumption is that "you must be gay." Oddly enough, if you're against
gay marriage, the qweer lobby will say it's because "you're secretly
gay." Perhaps the most often jumped-to conclusion is "The reason you
defend Israel is because you're a Jew." Anyone who is in favor of
a Jewish State (but isn't Jewish) has heard this one a million times.
For the last time, I'm not Jewish (but I consider it a
compliment).
|
|
|

|
Urban Legends are fun. Take a look at www.snopes.com
some time. No good American can resist talking about what happens when
you mix Pop Rocks and Coca Cola (nothing) or the serial killer who left
his "hook" on the car door of the couple at Lover's Lane. But as fun as
they are, they're a lousy debating technique. Some examples are: "Bush
STOLE the election," "Bush knew about 9/11," and "Bush is secretly an
android, sent from Deneb Five in order to drain the Earth of its
precious ooooooiiiiilllllll."
|
|
|
|
With
all due respect (none) to the New Agers out there, at this time of
global jihad, your "Let's just talk it over," or "let's chant ourselves
out of this mess" falls a bit flat. It's drivel, it's stupid, and we
can see it coming a mile away. "Can't we all just get along" may make a
nice punchline, but it's no match for real world pragmatic solutions to
the deadly menace we're all facing from the Islamists.
|
|
|
|
Here's
a great example of crossing the line from simple insult (ad hominem
attack) to Political Hate Speech. Notice the signs from "Reverend"
Phelp's organization. That's REAL hate speech. Unfortunately, liberals
have used the word "hate" so much, that it has lost most of its
meaning (and the LEFT uses political hate speech far more
than the right). Examples: "Bush is the REAL terrorist," "Bush is a miserable failure," and "America deserved 9/11."
|
|
|
|
Ahh
yes, the Drown Out. This is the favorite tactic of your average street
filth anti-war protester (translation: "America Hater"). I can say
without fear of contradiction that this is a major tactic of the left
(shutting everyone else up by drowning them out with your megaphone,
drums, or screaming). The next time I'm in downtown, and you blast that
goddamn whistle in my ear, I'm gonna make you eat it (oops, that's another tactic - "The Empty Threat"). But I'm out of time,
and that's all we'll do this week.
|
|